Search for: "Smith v. Van Gorkom" Results 41 - 60 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
The need for that legislation was itself created by the Court's 1985 decision in Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
In constructing this argument, Drury discusses Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am by Bridget Crawford
Van Gorkom (duty of care and business judgment rule) Francis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (1985) in which Jay Pritzker initiated a taker-over discussion with Trans-Union’s CEO, Jerome Van Gorkom. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In sum, the defining moment in the history of the Rule was not the famous case of Smith v Van Gorkom,[6] where the Court made absolutely clear that director liability could result from an uninformed Board decision, but the much older case of Bodell II.[7] This was the case, long before it could be said that the Rule was an abstention doctrine through its preclusion of duty of care claims, where the Rule, by precluding a fairness review of a Board decision… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Van Gorkom The Perils of Small-Minority Controllers Posted by Lucian A. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:56 pm
Van Gorkom, which nullified a seemingly fair agreement on procedural grounds. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Dennis Klein The financial crisis generated a great deal of litigation, much involving the directors and officers of companies affected by the crisis. [read post]