Search for: "Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores" Results 21 - 40 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2020, 11:50 am by Eugene Volokh
" Although public health risks may arise in allowing say, Wal-Mart, to continue its operations, the April 11 Order does not leave such business untouched. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Reyes, 272 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. 2008) (noting that, by enacting the TCHRA, the Texas Legislature "intended to correlate state law with federal law in employment discrimination cases") (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754, 755 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 93 Ohio St.3d 488, 756 N.E.2d 657 (2001) (Spoliation claim not barred by res judicata in cases in which evidence of spoliation is not discovered until after the conclusion of the primary action.) [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am by MBettman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., suggesting that the misrepresenting or even withholding of evidence might be an actionable wrong, was dicta.) [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am by Jeff Welty
App. 1995) (finding ample evidence of the defendant’s intent to steal a drill from Wal-Mart in part because a loss prevention officer “observed [the defendant] conceal the drill in his coat, pass all points of sale, and exit the store without paying for the drill”); State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am by Jeff Welty
App. 1995) (finding ample evidence of the defendant’s intent to steal a drill from Wal-Mart in part because a loss prevention officer “observed [the defendant] conceal the drill in his coat, pass all points of sale, and exit the store without paying for the drill”); State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Two employees of a nearby Wal-Mart saw the men leave the McDonald's. [read post]