Search for: "Smith v. Wedding" Results 1 - 20 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2013, 5:21 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
The New Mexico Supreme Court's recent opinion in Elaine Photography v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith are deputy general counsel and senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, plaintiff Lorie Smith wanted to expand her business to design custom websites for couples planning weddings. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 12:44 pm by Steve Shiffrin
Smith would like to provide her services for heterosexual weddings, but as a matter of religious conscience feels that she cannot provide the same services for same sex weddings. [read post]
27 May 2022, 11:21 am by Emanuela Tala
In June 2021, the Supreme Court declined an invitation to overturn Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The state of Washington's Supreme Court yesterday heard oral arguments in Ingersoll v. [read post]
Lorie Smith, the owner of 303 Creative, wishes to design wedding websites but would like to post a disclaimer on her website that she will not design websites for same-sex weddings because of her beliefs. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am by Dale Carpenter
The Supreme Court confronted a similar wedding cake case in 2018 in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith intends to expand the scope of 303 Creative's services to include the design, creation, and publication of wedding websites. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:18 pm by Dale Carpenter
The Tenth Circuit recognized that Smith's "creation of wedding websites"—through her sole proprietorship, 303 Creative—"is pure speech. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]