Search for: "Smith v. Winter*"
Results 1 - 20
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
In Smith v Smith, 2016 WL 4154938 (W.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
In the first, Smith v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:30 am
“The ‘usual discomforts of winter’ to which the district judge referred do not include handling heavy tools with gloveless hands in subzero weather. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
I gotta agree with Judge Milan Smith in this one. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Maybe the owner just really likes a warm car in the winter (unlikely to be necessary down here in Southern California, but possible). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
But in Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:27 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Smith). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
Blood and other samples were taken from Smith at the hospital. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
The starters (1) Interim injunction surprise In Neurim v Mylan [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat), Marcus Smith J ruled on the claimants’ application for a prohibitory injunction. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:00 am
In the case of Winters v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:59 am
The case is an action by Smith & Nephew to revoke Convatec’s patent relating to antimicrobial wound dressings impregnated with silver.Wound dressing for a Kat? [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
