Search for: "Smothers v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:04 pm
United States, 171 F.Supp. 283, 145 Ct.Cl. 225, holds plaintiff entitled to damages from military aircraft flying below the minimum altitude. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
See, e.g., Smothers v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
If you hear that an eye-witness is about to testify at trial and there has been no § 710.30 notice, but there was an identification procedure, move to preclude the testimony on § 710.30 grounds, as a violation of your client’s right to due process as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions, and on relevance grounds, because if the observation didn’t relate to your client, the testimony is not relevant. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Removal projects have included the use of benthic matting/barriers over EWM beds, which have proven effective at smothering and containing EWM, but which are also indiscriminate killers of other native aquatic plants and may also harm animals living in or on the lakebed being covered. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Removal projects have included the use of benthic matting/barriers over EWM beds, which have proven effective at smothering and containing EWM, but which are also indiscriminate killers of other native aquatic plants and may also harm animals living in or on the lakebed being covered. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 12:31 pm
Plaintiff Schumacher Homes is "one of the largest residential, custom home builders in the United States" and is licensed as a general contractor in North Carolina…. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
United States, testing the scope of the First Amendment when words that certainly sound like true threats are made on Facebook by a man after his wife left him. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
Garcia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:28 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
Yet that freedom is being smothered by one of the most complicated, expensive, and incomprehensible regulatory regimes ever invented by the administrative state. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
