Search for: "Smyth v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
For example, in Marsh v Smyth, this Court reversed a motion court's Frye ruling. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 8:10 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Parmalat Canada also relied upon the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Smyth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 22 conference) Smyth v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:22 am
 "We own the weekend", states this jocular tale of trade mark proprietorship. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 22 and December 6 conferences) Smyth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:45 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
In Smythe, the Court of Appeal considered whether the result was “reasonable” as that term has been defined in Dunsmuir v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform; Glenn Smith, Post and Courier; John Monk, The State] Tags: Canada, Florida, insurance, litigation finance, low-speed auto collisions, New York, New York state, Seventh Circuit, South Carolina Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
 * Book Review: Trade Marks Law by Glen GibbonsKatfriend Shane Smyth shares his thoughts on the second edition of Trade Marks Law, by Glen Gibbons, a book on trade mark law -- written from an Irish viewpoint. * A Milestone: IPKat's 10,000th Post! [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court issued the landmark decision, Padillo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 DRI had stated that it would not adopt a position of partisanship. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
This Kat did not have time to get round to reading Hospira v Genentech when it first emerged, and did not immediately notice that it was an entire new case in its own right, and not simply a codicil to the decision that he reported here. [read post]