Search for: "Snowball v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:23 am by Carolyn Elefant
Would you sacrifice six weeks of revenue for six years and instead, spend those six weeks toiling pro bono for a snowball’s chance in hell of victory before the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
For a sense of just how badly wrong Marc is about the scope of the First Amendment, consider the recent dismissal of the twitter-stalking case in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Rick Hills
Differential payroll taxation has always been used to equalize spending between states with state-financed unemployment insurance systems and states without: Why could not such a tax system solve the problem of "federalization snowballs"? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Skinny Dip Yogurt, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Snowizard – New Orleans snowball fight rages on: SnoWizard seeks review of [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm by Vivian Persand
The insureds compared their situation to the facts of the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in White v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:48 am by Vivian Persand
The Supreme Court of Alabama addressed a number of bad faith issues in its decision on Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog Tweets and Re-TweetsTTAB Posts January 2011 Hearing Schedule7th Circuit Rules That Sovereign Immunity Shields State from TM Infringement Counterclaim in Action for Review of TTAB DecisionText ©John L. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:40 am by SHG
This was the situation that Albert Holland placed at the doorstep of the Supreme Court in Holland v. [read post]