Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:25 am
Snowden v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
” Snowden v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
NSA in 2008, and our original case, Hepting v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:20 pm
NSAEFF v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
In Ford v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
Grits expects other states to follow our lead, just as other states are already following Montana's on cell phones. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
Book review and discussion questions for reading groups In No Place to Hide, Glenn Greenwald shows that a modern investigative reporter doesn’t just need the courage to take on the United States government and established media. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm
(Electronic Frontier Foundation v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
" Hilton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:21 pm
In July, based on documents filed before the Snowden revelations, the judge in the Jewel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:02 pm
District Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Fazaga v FBI, which flatly rejected the application of the state secret privilege in electronic surveillance cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 9:57 am
He directs me (and those interested) to State v. [read post]
