Search for: "Snowden v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 11:25 pm
Well, in view of the continuing Snowden revelations and increased focus on protecting personal information, we can be sure that this will add fuel to the fire of the on-going surveillance v privacy debate. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Hulu) http://t.co/FcBypcfwL1 -> US 1st Circuit affirms statutory damage award in Sony BMG v Tenenbaum http://t.co/ssyPB54Q82 -> Search of computer reasonable R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
The court did not see fit to alter the interpretation it adopted in Snowden v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
” In Clapper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
The Snowden saga continues: the first major public opinion poll on reaction to the Snowden leaks came out, courtesy of Quinnipiac University. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The order came to light only because Edward Snowden disclosed it. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
Different Member States may well take different views. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
However, according to Bruce, it probably is not Snowden’s fault. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:46 pm
That lawsuit, Jewel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 12:14 pm
Our amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:22 pm
Unresolved in 2013, the FTC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:45 am
” In Guantanamo news, Wells provided daily coverage of motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
This week marked 10 years since former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden exposed the mass surveillance practice employed by the UK and US. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Five years after we filed Jewel, and responding to further revelations in 2013 by whistleblower Edward Snowden, we filed First Unitarian Church v NSA on behalf of nearly two dozen organizations from across the political spectrum. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
The decision stands at odds from a ruling from a federal judge in Washington D.C.The case is A.C.L.U. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
