Search for: "Soares v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2020, 7:42 am by Rachel Bercovitz
(For those who are interested, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:54 am by Kristian Soltes
No-cost listings will become available in the United States next week and elsewhere before the end of 2020, Bill Ready, president of commerce at Mountain View, Calif. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am by SHG
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by SHG
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:48 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge [i] Lexington began as a frontier trading post in 1860. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
First and foremost, sports gambling is about to expand in the United States to an unprecedented extent. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by NCC Staff
On August 7, Edward Siskel, Chicago’s corporate counsel, sued Sessions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois about new conditions placed on a Justice Department grant application for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Benton Foundation – Andrew Jay Schwartzman, June 21, 2017: “On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States used an unlikely vehicle to expand the scope of First Amendment protection for Internet users. [read post]