Search for: "Sorensen v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 11:44 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
An Example of Risk - When a Judge Makes Comments to the Jury About Exhibit Contents In Sorensen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:32 am by luiza
This decision comes on the heels of a similar Sixth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
S. 2d 765, 767 (1943) (“Historically, the extension of one year’s time . . . is said to be an outgrowth of the ancient common law rule of ‘journey’s account’ ”); Sorensen v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
State policy required the University to “[v]erify” Oyama’s “ability to function effectively in Department classrooms” before approving his student teaching application. [read post]