Search for: "Sorge v. State"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
People v Sorge established that the trial courts have broad discretion to keep the proceedings within manageable limits and to curtail exploration of collateral matters. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Sorge, 301 N.Y. 198, 200 [1950]). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 pm
When the Member States of the EPC entered into an association, they completely disregarded the obligations imposed on them for many years by national constitutional law, by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – for all member states – as well as, for all EU member states, by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Germany, for example, is not the only state with ambitions in this regulatory arena. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Against this background the author discusses, in the context of refusal to supply abuses both in and outside an IP context, the operationalisation of the criterion of harm to consumers (section IV) before concluding (section V). [read post]
