Search for: "Sours v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Other tests: McDonald’s sexualization with M changed to woman’s spread legs; Titleist/Titties; Enjoy Cocaine; Sour Patch/marijuana . [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
Naughton's claim that he will never "embrace the notion of diocesan autonomy" is on a par with claiming that he "will never agree that grapefruits taste sour", or that "mosquito bites itch. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
Given the extent of personal information on an individual’s phone, such searches have been found to contravene Fourth Amendment protections; in Riley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
So the anti-230 claim reflects Trump’s sour grapes and his preference for chaos, not a substantive effort to vindicate his rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Consequently, the Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against her ADA and state law discrimination and retaliation claims (Oehmke v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The intended beneficiaries of the taxpayer-fueled Presidential Election Campaign Fund – presidential candidates – do not want it, as they are soured by its restrictions on their fundraising and spending. [read post]