Search for: "South Carolina v. Cross" Results 101 - 120 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 8:52 am by David Gans
  On June 21, the Fourth Circuit will hear North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:04 pm by Paul R. Monsees
On January 25, 2017, a federal appeals court that covers Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and North and South Carolina was the latest to craft a joint employer test, holding that a Maryland general contractor was the joint employer of its drywall subcontractor’s employees. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
South Carolina's Spartanburg Herald-Journal carried opposing OpEds on Sunday. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:05 pm
First, a Target store down in South Carolina falsely accused a woman of using a counterfeit $100 bill. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:13 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 327, 126 S.Ct. 1727, 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Gregory Forman
The Court of Appeals rejected Wife’s jurisdictional argument, noting she had been served in South Carolina and her actions indicated an intention to be domiciled in South Carolina. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of South Carolina:  State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:48 am by Andrew Frisch
And, indeed, Thompson and Hayden each crossed Indiana state lines on one occasion to transport KRD equipment to South Carolina. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
  Thus, not only would proponents of liberal constitutional change need to secure ratification from all states where she crossed the 40% mark – a group including states such as Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas – they also would have to pick up five states that voted more than three-to-two against Senator Clinton. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:20 am
Conversely, South Carolina had allowed a “Choose Life” plate but rejected a pro-abortion-rights plate. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by John Rubin
Applying the North Carolina Supreme Court’s reasoning from State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case was South Carolina v. [read post]