Search for: "South Carolina v. Glenn" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 3209 Florence, SC 29502 Phone: (843) 661-6909 Web: http://www.sc.easter-seals.org Easter Seals South Carolina -Greenville County 1122 Rutherford Road Greenville, SC 29609 Phone: (864) 232-4185 Web: http://www.sc.easter-seals.org Easter Seals South Carolina -Spartanburg County 1004 South Pine Street Spartanburg, SC 29302 Phone: (864) 582-8050 Web: http://www.sc.easter-seals.org Epilepsy Epilepsy Foundation South… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm by Brian A. Comer
On June 20, 2011, the South Carolina Supreme Court filed its opinion in Cole Vision Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
In April 2002, upon learning that Hamdi is an American citizen, authorities transferred him to a naval brig in Norfolk, Virginia, where he remained until a recent transfer to a brig in Charleston, South Carolina. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform; Glenn Smith, Post and Courier; John Monk, The State] Tags: Canada, Florida, insurance, litigation finance, low-speed auto collisions, New York, New York state, Seventh Circuit, South Carolina Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm by Stephen Griffin
  These laws were subject to litigation, like the McCrory case in North Carolina and Veasey v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
South Carolina’s H. 3060 would repeal mandatory minimums for drug offenses and expand treatment diversion eligibility. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Highlights Legal Risks for Trump Yahoo News – Alan Feuer and Glenn Thrush (New York Times) | Published: 6/29/2022 The extent to which the Justice Department’s expanding criminal inquiry into the insurrection at the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the Legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the Legislature in California a different one. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Sun Oil Co. (1943), federal courts should abstain from resolving a constitutional challenge to South Carolina's anti-gambling laws. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Medicaid Services: SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE IF CALIFORNIA CAN CUT MEDICAID PAYMENTS, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
The South Carolina Appellate Law Blog says the decision creates an unworkable standard in After Philip Morris: What can a jury consider for punitive damages purposes? [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am by Avery Schmitz
The event will begin with a live recording of the Institute for Justice’s Short Circuit podcast, featuring Joanna Schwartz, professor of law at the University of California, Los Angeles; Carlos Vázquez, professor of law at Georgetown University; Seth Stoughton, professor of law at the University of South Carolina; Alexander Reinert, professor of law at Yeshiva University; and moderator Anya Bidwell, attorney at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm by cdw
Torres contends the photographs should have been excluded based on South Carolina Rule of Evidence 403, and the videotape recording should have been excluded based on either Rule 403 or Section 16-3-25(C)(1) of the South Carolina Code (2003). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]