Search for: "South Carolina v. Price"
Results 21 - 40
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
South Carolina Clean Air Initiative, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:51 am
Her husband’s motion for temporary relief sought to have her return to South Carolina in an attempt to force her to bear their child in South Carolina–and thus insure South Carolina had subject matter jurisdiction to address custody. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
(The Fourth Circuit is the federal appellate circuit covering Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.) [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #SOURCEBrownell v Starbucks Coffee Company (Class Action Complaint) [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
The State of South Carolina launched into uncharted territory when it disallowed the bid protest of the second low bidder in the case of Martin Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:58 am
" Schulmeyer v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
While granting the motion to file, the Court turned down a request from South Carolina seeking to bar North Carolina temporarily from authoizing any excess diversions of water from the river (Application 06A1150). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
Pleasant, South Carolina, with a home page title of "South Carolina Nursing Home Negligence | Nursing Home Abuse Law Firm. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
Comer Today's brief is of Schall v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:51 am
Experts:Amo's expert was Gary Roland, a plumber in Lexington, South Carolina. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:34 am
Price v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:51 am
South Carolina Public Service Authority, et al.; No. 3:17-cv-02764 (D.S.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:38 pm
The mandate results from a ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court that upheld a prior administrative ruling that OTCs were required to pay taxes based upon the full price paid by customers, and not just the discounted, negotiated rate worked out between OTCs and hotels. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:45 am
" The full opinion can be found at the South Carolina Supreme Court website under Winrose Homeowners' Association, Inc., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
" The full opinion can be found at the South Carolina Supreme Court website under Winrose Homeowners' Association, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
’” Mangling a quote from a prior decision upholding Section 5, South Carolina v. [read post]
