Search for: "South Carolina v. Samuels"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 11:26 am
The NAACP sued on behalf of voters in Alexander v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Section 3 applied to South Carolina rebels. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
But in North Carolina, U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
In language strikingly reminiscent of South Carolina’s stance in the nullification crisis of the early 1830s, the viewpoint of the states that attempted to secede during the Civil War, and the Southern Manifesto that defiantly asserted the constitutionality of Jim Crow in the 1950s, SAPA purports to nullify various federal statutes claimed to conflict with a tendentiously extreme version of the Second Amendment. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
At the same time, he studied law under Samuel Johnston, a local lawyer and the future first United States Senator from North Carolina. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
” Employers in the Fourth Circuit (which includes Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia), and businesses that qualify as places of public accommodation operating in the Fourth Circuit should make sure that their policies, practices, and procedures with respect providing reasonable accommodation to employees who may be experiencing gender dysphoria, align with this decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Tim Scott from South Carolina have faced continual racist tropes from the left, including a Maryland Delegate Gabriel Acevero stating that “Tim Scott isn’t naive, he’s cooning” to please white people. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
North Carolina State Board of Elections, Wise v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Approximately 25 years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, involving allegations of racial gerrymandering in a South Carolina congressional district. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
The South Carolina case began as part of a broader challenge, filed by the South Carolina NAACP and an individual voter, to three of the state’s seven congressional districts. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
Skaar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:19 am
South Carolina, the Supreme Court held that capital defendants have a constitutional right to inform the jury that they would not be eligible for parole if the jury returned a life sentence. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
By 1790 both North Carolina and Rhode Island had ratified the Constitution and the proposed amendments. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
One of the charges, after all, brought in the great trials against the Klan in South Carolina in 1872 was their attempt to suppress the right of African-Americans to bear arms. [read post]
