Search for: "South Carolina v. Samuels"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:37 pm
Both Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett suggested collapsing the test into a single inquiry deriving from South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:44 pm
The Ku Klux Klan Act’s passage followed racial violence and terrorism in South Carolina. [read post]
Justices add three new cases, including challenge to animal-welfare law and Warhol copyright dispute
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am
South Carolina applies to Arizona, also applies to cases that are pending on collateral review. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Samuel Brenner, ed. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Section 3 applied to South Carolina rebels. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
The five-to-four ruling, written by Justice Alito, sent the case back to the South Carolina state courts to apply state custody and adoption laws. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:14 am
Strom Thurmond of South Carolina thundered: “Mallory! [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
South Carolina, which held that jurors must receive such information to rebut an inference that the defendant posed a danger in the future. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Luke’s Hospital v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
“Red-state Democrats are going to have a very hard decision, and I hope that every Republican will rally behind these picks because they’re all outstanding,” Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said yesterday, reports Max Greenwood for The Hill. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
That dilemma was eased in 2001 by another case out of North Carolina, Easley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm
Today the justices announced that they would take on South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that South Carolina argued was insufficiently deferential to the trial judge’s determination that there was manifest necessity to grant a mistrial over the objection of the defendant, Broderick Seay. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
North Carolina State Board of Elections, Wise v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
