Search for: "South Coast Air Quality Management District v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2021, 11:41 am
We will introduce the many actors and events in this multipolar environmental dispute by using the allegations of the petition filed by South Coast Air Quality Management District (the Air District). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
South Coast Air Quality Management District et al. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310 (“ConocoPhillips”); Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
Enter the California Attorney General, the City of Long Beach, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Long Beach Unified School District, and a coalition of environmental and environmental justice NGOs, all of which filed suit under CEQA seeking to stop the SCIG project. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:45 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1171. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, 328.) [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
South Coast Air Quality Management District (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 406: Applying the substantial evidence standard, the court upheld a challenge to the use of an environmental assessment (as a de facto negative declaration) for the adoption of new air district rules regulating manufacturer use of ozone forming volatile organic compounds. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City of Los Angeles (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 768. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management District (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310 (lead agency has discretion to choose methodology to determine how “existing conditions” are best and most realistically measured for baseline purposes where conditions are fluctuating, so long as supported by substantial evidence). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(B); Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management District (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 588, and my 4/21/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:09 am
” (Citing South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
South Coast Air Quality Management District (June 28, 2012, B233892) ___Cal.App.4th ___: Applying the substantial evidence standard, the court upheld a challenge to the use of an environmental assessment (as a de facto negative declaration) for the adoption of new air district rules regulating manufacturer use of ozone forming volatile organic compounds. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
. - Chris Anderson, South Coast Today, March 4, 2010 City officials are pushing for the remaining funds in the New Bedford Harbor trust to be allocated to city projects, arguing that the money should be spent as close as possible to where the damage from the long-running contamination of the harbor occurred. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– EPA News Release, April 30, 2010 EPA Region 7 and GSA Heartland today signed an Environmental Working Agreement that outlines a plan to further investigate and manage environmental conditions at GSA-managed facilities within the Bannister Federal Complex in Kansas City, Mo. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Respect Life South San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
