Search for: "South Coast Air Quality Management District v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its failure to act on the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) plan to reduce particulate matter, or soot. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:55 pm by Environmental Law Prof
In 2011, the South Coast Air Quality Management District adopted Rule 317, which imposes fees on certain programs aimed... [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
In the case environmental groups challenge a rule of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am by WIMS
  Arguing on behalf of the South Coast Air Quality. . . [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm by WIMS
      Under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the District is responsible for developing a plan that ensures new emission increases are offset by reductions. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Holly Doremus
Bandza, In Brief, South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Southern California Air Quality Management District, 2011 W.L. 2557246 (C.A. 9 (Cal.)), the National Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) sought to call the Southern California Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) to account for purportedly using invalid “offsets” for emissions increases resulting from new stationary sources. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Numerous industry groups, including the American Chemistry Council and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have intervened in support of EPA. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm by WIMS
The Natural Resources Defense Council and other groups (collectively, the NRDC) appeal the district court dismissal of their claims against the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by WIMS
"       South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast) argued for a maximum WI of 1360 in California, however, FERC observed that "[t]he record contains no analysis or evidence showing a material change in air quality impacts as a result of the consumption of natural gas with a WI of 1385 . . . compared to that of [South Coast's]… [read post]