Search for: "South v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Martin apparently signed by a Marine Corps colonel acting in his official capacity. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Because most any person who knew Trayvon Martin would be from South Florida. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Because most any person who knew Trayvon Martin would be from South Florida. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:29 am by Alfred Brophy
In honor of Martin Luther King Day, I thought I'd post some pictures of the monument to African Americans on the South Carolina statehouse grounds. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Caroline Ncube
The IPLJ includes articles on recent developments in legislation, policy and case law to keep IP practitioners at the forefront of the law.Contents Include:• Articles• Deprivation of trademarks through state interference in their usage - Owen Dean• Some comments on the infringement of registered trademarks by advertisement of goods on the internet - Bernard Martin• Justifications for copyright: the moral justifications - Sadulla Karjiker• Rights in a performance in… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am by Candace Cathey
E185.97.K5B3530 1992 Regenstein Toward the Beloved Community : Martin Luther King, Jr. and South Africa. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
    The State of South Carolina launched into uncharted territory when it disallowed the bid protest of the second low bidder in the case of Martin Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:42 pm
[www.oranous.com]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-1873 MICHAEL RIVERA, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
District Court for the Western District of South Carolina, April 1, 2016). [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 11:35 pm
Martin Luther King Jr. remarked, "If we can crack Birmingham, I am convinced we can crack the South. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am by John Day
Martin, 305 S.C. 144, 146-47, 406 S.E.2d 372, 374 (1991) (finding a special duty for architects); Lloyd v. [read post]