Search for: "South v. Peters" Results 201 - 220 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
: Urooj Ahmad v Maya Appliances (IP Frontline) Ireland Commercial Court makes first Community designs ruling: Karen Millen Ltd v Dunnes Stores (International Law Office) Israel Boy from package of Israeli chocolate drink sues Elite for 5 million NIS (The IP Factor) Kenya Court of Appeal declines to set aside High Court order restraining Delta Connections from using DELTA (Afro-IP) South Africa South African Revenue Services loses two recent cases relating… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: USPTO publishes interim guidelines on examining statutory subject matter (Patently-O) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IP Spotlight) (Filewrapper) South Africa: Company and Intellectual Property Registration Office implicated in identity theft (IP finance) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP)   Global… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Intellectual Property and the Public Interest: Toward a Festschrift for Peter A. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
Odoni, supra.It goes on to explain that on April 13, 2007, Gunter arrived at Gatwick Airport,an international airport south of London. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
Day 2 and 3 of the hearing brought premature reports that the the Board of Appeal would be referring questions on priority to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA), with Day 4 ultimately bringing the conclusion that Broad Institute's appeal would be dismissed, due to their patent being found to lack priority.SpecialKat Chijioke Okorie examined the decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and 2… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an important judgment in the case of Duffy v Google Inc  ([2015] SASC 170) Blue J in the South Australian Supreme Court found that Google is legally responsible when its search results link to defamatory content. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Holder regarding whether “the citizens of the South are more racist than citizens in the North. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Peter explained that many of the expected benefits of the new IPR procedure had held true. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is… [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
Technetix B.V. v Teleste Limited".OtherThe AmeriKat provides another FRANDly update, covering HTC v Ericsson, European Parliament SEP analysis, and more! [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]