Search for: "Southern Maryland Oil Company v. Texas Company" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
” Following years of negotiations over the liability of Enbridge, a Canadian energy company, in the 2010 oil spill in Michigan’s Kalamazoo River—in which a pipeline rupture caused the largest inland oil spill in American history—the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Historically, the property had been the site of a chemical manufacturing plant operated by Maryland Chemical Company. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., in which the court granted review. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Mobil Oil Guam President Genarro Cioffi in April said the company, after an internal review, found that its fuel terminals in Guam and the CNMI may not have been in full compliance with federal and local regulations. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency a $38,500 penalty for violations of the Clean Water Act requirements related to the prevention of oil spills. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The Agency’s response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Maryland and because the district court made several erroneous evidentiary rulings. [read post]