Search for: "Southwestern Trading Co. v. United States"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 5:35 am
Chavez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm
United States, 325 U.S. 212, 222-23 (1945)). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Why many of the state’s most influential lawyers and policy experts think it shouldn’t be anything more than a trade association. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 am
United States and Murphy Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz) Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog), Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills you will need to… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
The Supreme Court has made clear in Community Communications Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
