Search for: "Sox v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 11:19 am
This past Friday, the United State Supreme Court granted cert. in the case of Lawson v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:48 pm
In Tides v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:48 pm
In Tides v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:06 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
In Lawson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
United States Department of Labor, June 13, 2019, Quattlebaum, A.). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
The Second Circuit Ruling The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, heard oral arguments on April 1, 2022. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
This has significant effects upon the United States. . . . [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
On September 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit clarified what a whistleblower plaintiff must allege to demonstrate they had a “reasonable belief” that their employer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
On September 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit clarified what a whistleblower plaintiff must allege to demonstrate they had a “reasonable belief” that their employer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:22 am
Judge Robert Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York stated in the case of Sharkey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:31 am
United States], 505 U. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The court had previously interpreted nearly identical language in the Federal Railroad Safety Act as requiring evidence of retaliatory intent, another reason to interpret SOX consistently with that holding.In his petition for certiorari, the whistleblower points to the burdens of proof incorporated by reference in the SOX provision (“An action brought under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49,… [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
The case, Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
See Beam v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:01 am
By: Joseph Marrow On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in a much anticipated whistleblower retaliation case. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:00 pm
In addition to state standards and the requirements of SOX, the stock exchanges each have their own standards for independence. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am
United States Dep’t of Labor, 134 F.3d 1292, 1295 (6th Cir. 1998). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:15 am
On February 27, 2009, the United States Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board ("ARB") affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") opinion in Kalkunte v. [read post]
