Search for: "Sox v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 6:48 am
”Section 1519 states the penalty for a person who “knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:51 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Murray v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
On September 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit clarified what a whistleblower plaintiff must allege to demonstrate they had a “reasonable belief” that their employer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
On September 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit clarified what a whistleblower plaintiff must allege to demonstrate they had a “reasonable belief” that their employer violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
The government submits that the United States has a significant interest in the question presented because the DOL enforces the SOX provision and the SEC has an interest in protecting whistleblowers. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:09 am
The case, Murray v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
In April 2016, Forterra acquired United States Pipe Holdings, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
United States, 870 F. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The court had previously interpreted nearly identical language in the Federal Railroad Safety Act as requiring evidence of retaliatory intent, another reason to interpret SOX consistently with that holding.In his petition for certiorari, the whistleblower points to the burdens of proof incorporated by reference in the SOX provision (“An action brought under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49,… [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
Circuit agreed with the DOL Administrative Review Board that Section 806 does not have extraterritorial application and the facts of the case did not give rise to a domestic application of SOX (Garvey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 2:28 pm
Bechtel v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
In a recent decision, Trevor Murray v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:43 am
The Second Circuit Ruling The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, heard oral arguments on April 1, 2022. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
“Sherron, even if it’s the last $10,000 you have, you have to use it to hire an attorney. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Section 14(3) cases are as rare as a White Sox fan in Boston. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
CFIUS concluded that the acquisition “threatens to impair the national security of the United States” and recommended divestiture. [read post]
