Search for: "Sox v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2014, 8:01 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
By: Joseph Marrow On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in a much anticipated whistleblower retaliation case. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Andy Sellars
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
But the court was not convinced, noting that “the fact that a person outside the United States may be a `whistleblower’ under Dodd-Frank does not compel the conclusion he is protected by the Anti-Retaliation Provision. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:19 am by laborprof lpb
This past Friday, the United State Supreme Court granted cert. in the case of Lawson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:06 am by Richard Renner
Supreme Court issued an order inviting the Solicitor General of the United States to file a brief "expressing the views of the United States" in Lawson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Richard Renner
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am by admin
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]