Search for: "Spath v Zack"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
In addition, defendants were aware of the 2007 Action and appeared to demand a complaint as early as April 2008 - they were not prejudiced by the service errors and were afforded full participation in discovery (see Spath v Zack, 36 AD3d 410, 413 [2007]). [read post]