Search for: "Spear v. Place"
Results 21 - 40
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Congress passed ICWA to respond to concerns that state child-welfare practices were causing large numbers of Native American children to be inappropriately removed from their families and tribes and placed with non-Native foster families or adoptive parents. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, Oklahoma jumped 13 places on our ranking. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:48 pm
[G&G Oil Co of Indiana, Inc v Continental Western Insurance Co: Supreme Court of Indiana: case no. 20S-PL-617] [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:48 pm
[G&G Oil Co of Indiana, Inc v Continental Western Insurance Co: Supreme Court of Indiana: case no. 20S-PL-617] [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
" In the words of another villager, "I tried to take my spear to protect my family, but they threatened me with a gun, so I stopped. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm
Mauia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:22 am
(§ 32 V-W.) [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
”To put a conservatorship in place, a petition must be filed in court, followed by a hearing. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 12:17 pm
Buck v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:47 am
And recall from UMG v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:56 am
In G&G Oil Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 10:52 am
The plaintiff cites only Bufalino v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Gilden: Agrees that giving rights away is an issue, but also interested in why we give people © in the first place if they lack capacity. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
As a result, Rhode Island jumped 10 places on our ranking. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
As this term’s decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 4:32 am
The court’s first opinion came in a case captioned Dominguez v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:30 am
Spears, 636 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
In Case C-432/18 Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH, Advocate General Hogan has advised the Court of Justice to rule that the terms "Aceto", "Balsamico" and "Aceto Balsamico" should not qualify for protection as Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) under Regulation No. 1151/2012. [read post]
