Search for: "Spears v. Spears" Results 21 - 40 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
The New York State 2022-2023 Budget[1] amendment QQ updated the State’s approach to freshwater wetlands regulation. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting the ruling in Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, [cert. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting the ruling in Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, [cert. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 10:00 pm
Helmsley-Spear Inc., for the proposition that these five mural pieces were individual works which did not qualify as “visual art” under VARA, since they served a utilitarian function beyond their visual appeal. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
On the morning of January 6, Tony Ornato, Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, advised Meadows that the crowd gathering for the rally on the Ellipse included people carrying “knives, guns in the form of pistols and rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears and flag poles. [read post]
In particular, we were skeptical that Trump’s speech would satisfy the stringent requirement of Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 2:11 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The Court supported its interpretation on the limits of preemption under the Act by citing the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in American Airlines v. [read post]