Search for: "Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp." Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2009, 10:19 am by Venkat
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir.2002), for one example). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by Charles Bieneman
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2001): “whether the contractual terms were ‘reasonably conspicuous’ and whether Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:58 am by John Ottaviani
Netscape Communications Corp. , "where 'submerged' website provisions were found insufficient to bind the company's customers. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by John Ottaviani
Netscape Communications Corp., "where 'submerged' website provisions were found insufficient to bind the company's customers. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:02 pm by John Delaney and Sherman Kahn
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002), in which the Second Circuit had rejected an arbitration clause in a terms of use agreement for inadequate notice. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002) (declining to enforce an arbitration provision contained in a software licensing browsewrap agreement where the hyperlink to the agreement appeared on “a submerged screen” below the “Download” button that the plaintiffs clicked to initiate the download). [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
RRL Corp. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 261, 270 (Donovan) [“An essential element of any contract is the consent of the parties. [read post]
As NFTs became more popular in 2021, there was a groundswell of vocal pushback to this concept from the NFT community. [read post]