Search for: "Specking v. Specking"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Compare Speck v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:01 am
Catherine Gutowski & Quinn Speck from the Joel Barlow High School in Connecticut represented the Respondent. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:05 am
Vizcarra v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:07 pm
Who wants to distribute a path-breaking opinion if a rough draft will be fly-specked on Twitter? [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am
ColbIn his draft opinion for the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
The ability of newspapers generally and, in particular, the defendant’s publications, to summarise to the Judge’s satisfaction the burden and content of his earlier decision on 11 February 2021 in Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch), evidently irked him. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:10 pm
The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Myco Industries v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:56 pm
In Oliver v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:28 am
Pierce v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:24 am
May I suggest that judicial efforts to preserve anonymity in legal cases is but a speck in an ocean cluttered with people who can’t wait to share what they are up to and just how badly their ex-spouse or boyfriend treats the kids. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:30 am
Many of these quotations are from learned judgments including the inevitable quotation from Lord Denning MR - a classic from Rank Film Distributors Ltd v Video Information Centre [1982] 2 AC 380:"It is, it is a glorious thing, to be a Pirate King," said W. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
The case of Cicco v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
For Actavis/Mylan, Adrian Speck QC made submissions on plausibility and infringement, with Pushpinder Saini QC dealing with the remaining issues of construction and abuse of process. [read post]
