Search for: "Spencer, C. v. Spencer, L."
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Herbert Spencer was a big author for this purpose, especially in the US. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:00 am
Mark C. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The IPKat commends the Court of Appeal for England and Wales for the robust terms in which it condemns the foolish, inept and anticompetitive ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure (discussed on this weblog here, here, here, here and here). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Attorney for State: Ann L. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm
Evid. 611(c) While a “yes/no” questions is definitely leading “[l]eading questions can have varying degrees of suggestiveness. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
John C. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:18 pm
Circuit decision in Nat'l Ass'n of Broadcasters v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:54 pm
See Spencer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
L. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:56 pm
Perkins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:54 am
& Lee L. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In Henry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 1553 (June 2008) Geoffrey C. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 1553 (June 2008) Geoffrey C. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
See, e.g., Green Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Sandgrund and Sullan.Reproduced by permission of the Colorado Bar Association Vol. 39, August, 2010, pg. 89-96, (c) Colorado Bar Association 2010. [read post]
