Search for: "Spencer v. Civil Service Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
 Despite a period of uncertainty, the Supreme Court clarified the law in Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2015] UKSC 72, confirming that the traditional strict tests still represent the law. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
’ News Corp boss Rupert Murdoch married Jerry Hall on Friday at Spencer House in London. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for its refusal to hire a child care worker with cerebral palsy. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Statements of President Obama  made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am by William McGrath
Khuzami pointed to a principle from a 1973 Second Circuit Court of Appeals as a reason for the Commission's historical successes: "the Commission 'can bring the large number of enforcement actions it does only because in all but a few cases consent decrees are entered.'" SEC v. [read post]