Search for: "Spencer v. Moore"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 2:51 am
According to former Special Branch counter-terrorist detective David Lowe, now an expert in crime and security at Liverpool John Moores University, this fact alone makes them, in several key respects, more dangerous. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm
D is for Digital Canada 150, the long awaited digital strategy released in April by Industry Minister James Moore. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
D is for Digital Canada 150, the long awaited digital strategy released in April by Industry Minister James Moore. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Cir. 2002), citing Tualatin Electric v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Marks & Spencer said it had begun legal action against Aldi to “protect” the caterpillar cake Colin from rival chocolate sponge roll Cuthbert. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm
A prior S2KM blog post examines these three defense strategies in the context of the Spencer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Sheffield v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Spencer, No. 07-40593 "A decision amending a 1995 judgment sentencing defendant for carjacking, resulting in an increase to the amount of restitution owed, is affirmed where: 1) under a reasonable reading of the relevant rules and case law, the district court's amendment amounted to a clerical revision that did not substantively alter defendant's sentence; and 2) thus, the time limitation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 was inapplicable. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72 (Case Comment here). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
Ct. 2076, 2091 (2015); Dames & Moore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
