Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
That was the issue addressed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its decision this month in Spencer-Forrest v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
The Lochner part refers to a 1905 Supreme Court decision, Lochner v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In the first New York appellate decision to rule on the issue, the Appellate Division, Second Department held in its February 28, 2018 opinion in Spencer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Spencer. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As Jefferson later emphasized to the Virginia jurist Spencer Roane, who was doing battle in the press with Chief Justice John Marshall over the court’s opinion in the McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 5:50 am
Because the record overwhelmingly confirmed his wrongdoing and that the school district suffered prejudice, a federal court in Pennsylvania precluded him from using the documents, ordered him to return them, and stated that it would determine before trial whether to impose any additional sanctions for his misconduct and false testimony (Spencer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:54 am
Likewise in the High Court, the Claimant wished to rely on them in the High Court in relation to their case on distinctiveness (and not as evidence of confusion).It is clear from Interflora 1 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2012] EWCA Civ 1501) and Interflora 2 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2013] EWCA Civ 319) that surveys should only be permitted if they are of "real value". [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:06 am
Kim, and Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:08 am
Debacker v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
But the Supreme Court recently, in Munaf v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Marks & Spencer has developed its “Plan A” standards), market reaction to the competitive advantage gained by early-adopters, the responsible development of the global south, and government intervention. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
Supreme Court heard arguments this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See Letter to Spencer Roane (Sept. 2, 1819), in 8 Writings of James Madison 450 (G. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Despite a period of uncertainty, the Supreme Court clarified the law in Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited [2015] UKSC 72, confirming that the traditional strict tests still represent the law. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Additional Resources: FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades, April 18, 2015, By Spencer S. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
In a recent High Court case (Cox v Spencer [2017] EWHC 2552 (QB)), the employer was granted an order that meant it could image the employee’s computer to see if it contained any of their confidential information. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:08 am
Spencer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
