Search for: "Spencer v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
The post Spencer v Taylor – section 21 news appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:36 am by Tessa Shepperson
In fact for landlords, Christmas may well have come early … Taylor v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm by David Smith
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:37 am by Tessa Shepperson
The speakers This year we have a fantastic line up of speakers: David Smith, a partner in Anthony Gold solicitors, talking about section 21 (he was one of the solicitors in the Spencer v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Canadian hospital, sick of US test monopoly, sues to stop gene patents http://t.co/rpv3JcFUsg -> Finding of infringement by use of keywords reversed by UKCA Interflora v Marks and Spencer Plc [2014] EWCA Civ 1403 http://t.co/3sQPf43ac1 -> Google Takedown Requests Surge After New Anti-Piracy Measures http://t.co/t0Oo7iVTK6 -> Verizon, AT&T tracking their users with ‘supercookies’ http://t.co/lSwh4I18Yv -> Microsoft's top legal gun decries privacy… [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Spencer v Taylor [2013] EWCA Civ 1600This case was flagged recently on the Arden Chambers eflash service. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
Spencer v Taylor [2013] EWCA Civ 1600This case was flagged recently on the Arden Chambers eflash service. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Spencer’s departure from the Trump administration. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Fourteen years later, a Pennsylvania court recognized that a physician might not be the best expert on nursing standards, but it still allowed physicians' testimony to be admitted because, "all areas of medical expertise within the knowledge of nurses are also within the knowledge of medical doctors" (Taylor v Spencer Hospital, 292 A2d 449, 452 [Pa Super 1972]). [read post]