Search for: "Spicer v. Spicer" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
  Contrary to the recent statement by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, the vast majority of these were not transferred out pursuant to “court order. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm by Abbe Gluck
  For a bill of this magnitude, not getting the score before the vote was highly unorthodox .In King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
In his perplexing tweetstorm yesterday, possibly prompted by nothing more than some blend of Mark Levin and Breitbart, President Trump accused former President Obama of wiretapping him in Trump Tower before the election. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In its original form, Part V introduces new criminal offences for disclosure of public authority and government data with no specified protection for public interest journalism. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 3:58 am by SHG
The law recognizes the existence of the Fourth Estate in such decisions as New York Times v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:30 am by Lyle Denniston
” That specific issue is scheduled to come up in a Supreme Court hearing on March 28 in the case of Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
However, Spicer also said Trump “fully expects to and wants to get along with Russia. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Spicer, 2016 SCC 3 (36532) Judgment rendered Jan. 18, 2016 Publication ban, re defence of mistaken belief. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:56 am by Ben
One would think that Shields has a good case that the uses constitute "fair use" - not least from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]