Search for: "Spicer v. Spicer" Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On 7 June 2019 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) (heard 5 June 2019). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:24 am by Russ Bensing
Spicer, the court holds that applies even if the other sentence is in a different case. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Misinformation and Technology: Rights and Regulation Across Borders, Global Constitutionalism: 2020, Robert Post and Miguel Maduro, Yale Law School Next Week in the Courts On 1 February 2021 Julian Knowles J will hear the trial in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police for [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
  Contrary to the recent statement by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, the vast majority of these were not transferred out pursuant to “court order. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In its original form, Part V introduces new criminal offences for disclosure of public authority and government data with no specified protection for public interest journalism. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 3:58 am by SHG
The law recognizes the existence of the Fourth Estate in such decisions as New York Times v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Nicklin J  handed down judgment in Ward v Associated Newspapers [2021] EWHC 641 (QB). [read post]