Search for: "Spicer v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 3:58 am
China’s WTO Challenge v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
In the case of Hategan v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Judge Paul V. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Relying on statements made by President Trump, Press Secretary Sean Spicer, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the court finds such intent broadly. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Misinformation and Technology: Rights and Regulation Across Borders, Global Constitutionalism: 2020, Robert Post and Miguel Maduro, Yale Law School Next Week in the Courts On 1 February 2021 Julian Knowles J will hear the trial in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police for [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
For whatever it’s worth, the only case that has closely dealt with this, Davison v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Maynard battled former solicitor general Don Verrilli in the case of The Weird Sisters v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
And Cacheris frequently cited Packingham v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
White House press secretary Sean Spicer. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Zaden v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a majority in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
The attorneys cite Packingham v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
