Search for: "Spicer v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On 7 June 2019 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) (heard 5 June 2019). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Article I, for example, provided that Clinton “willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States” by “impeding the administration of justice. [read post]
According to the statement of the offense, on Jan. 24, 2017, Flynn voluntarily agreed to an interview with FBI agents, during which he said “he did not ask Russia’s Ambassador to the United States … to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Scott Bomboy
The Knight Institute is representing filed seven plaintiffs in the United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm by Kristen Friend
Press secretary Sean Spicer said in a press briefing at the beginning of June that tweets are “considered official statements by the President of the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am by Alex Potcovaru
United States and the political question doctrine, the criminal law implications of the Trump Jr. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:40 am by Robert Loeb, Michael Linhorst
  The President’s own spokesman, Sean Spicer, has stated that the posts of the President on @realDonaldTrump should be “considered official statements by the President of the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:21 am by Scott Bomboy
On Tuesday, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed its lawsuit on behalf of seven plaintiffs in the United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Addressing the first accusation, Maynard argued that the Sisters’ prophesying activity was protected by the First Amendment. (11th century Scottish law here looks remarkably similar to that of the 21st century United States.) [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the account’s “bio” line, Trump identifies himself as the “45th President of the United States of America. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Thomas J. Crane
The unanimous three-judge decision found that of the six countries identified in the ban, none had ever posed a risk to the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
United States and the implications of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am by Josh Blackman
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]