Search for: "Spink v. Spink" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 5:47 am by Unreported Opinions
At trial, the contested issue was whether Spinks did so, ... [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
By Ralph Cox* and Simon Spink** -- Overview For the best part of 10 years, since the judgment of Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v Hoescht Marion Roussel[1], it has been widely assumed that there is no file wrapper estoppel in the UK and no doctrine of equivalents either. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:28 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Sixth District) issued this published opinion ruling that a trial court erred in dismissing a plaintiff's punitive damages claims on summary judgment.The primary issue in this case--whether the plaintiff had a viable claim for breach of contract on a third-party beneficiary theory--is outside the scope of this blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
  He also cited Hallen Co v Brabantia (UK) Ltd [1991] RPC 195 and Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2002] RPC 22, both in relation to the relevance of commercial considerations to obviousness. [read post]