Search for: "Spitz v. United States" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
His cellphone.Using records of cell use — from phone calls to Twitter usage to Web access — Spitz was able to construct “an exact road map of what he did,” as state Rep. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm by Eric Biber
  This approach is not unique to the United States – rights of nature legal approaches have been used in New Zealand, Bolivia, and Ecuador. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
 Elsewhere, in the United Kingdom, for instance, a period of five years is and was relevant. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:22 am by Sean Wajert
For several decades, Halliburton performed a variety of important tasks on the Site at issue, including work for the United States Department of Defense cleaning out missile motor casings. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The United States has a "federated system," said Hall, with four main biometric databases that after 9/11 all began to share data directly or indirectly. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]