Search for: "Spitz v. Williams" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A SERIOUS THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE FORUM: ESTOPPEL AND TRADE MARK INFRINGEMENT
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm by Afro-Buff
In this regard it is worth noting and adapting what was said in William Grant & Sons Ltd v Cape Wine & Distillers Ltd 1990 (3) SA 897 (C), being that “[t]he mere lapse of a number of years during which plaintiffs took no action does not in itself justify a finding of acquiescence on their part” (at 924A). [read post]
Afro-IP - http://afro-ip.blogspot.com/
COA Opinion: Disclosure of high-low agreements to the jury is not required if integrity of the judicial process is nonetheless preserved
2 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
Spitz, were sufficient to support such a finding. [read post]
One Court of Justice - http://www.ocjblog.com