Search for: "Spitzer v. Spitzer"
Results 21 - 40
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:45 am
’s motion for summary judgment in the underlying action (Spitzer v Newman, 163 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2018] [ citations omitted]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
“The causation element requires a showing that the injured party would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d at 545 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Tucker was fired amid allegations he unilaterally began investigating his suspicions that Spitzer was giving prefe [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:05 am
Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:08 am
In Spitzer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
The case in McBrayer v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Spitzer Industries, Inc., 4:20-cv-02152 (S.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:54 am
Lund, Reconsidering Thornton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:57 pm
Prior to the landmark case of People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:00 pm
Spitzer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:29 am
Gilt Group, and Spitzer v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:34 am
Spitzer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 10:48 am
Matthew Spitzer, Northwestern has a piece in CPI on FTC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
To establish that they were intended third-party beneficiaries, plaintiffs must establish “(1) the existence of a valid and binding contract between other parties, (2) that the contract was intended for his/her benefit and (3) that the benefit to him/her is sufficiently immediate, rather than incidental, to indicate the assumption by the contracting parties of a duty to compensate him if the benefit is lost” (State of California Public Employees’ Retirement… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The court then explained that order to state a cause of action to recover for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, the plaintiff must allege a specific business relationship with an identified third party with which the defendants interfered, citing a number of court decisions including Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Linder, 88 AD2d 50, 72, affd 59 NY2d 314). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The court then explained that order to state a cause of action to recover for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, the plaintiff must allege a specific business relationship with an identified third party with which the defendants interfered, citing a number of court decisions including Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v Linder, 88 AD2d 50, 72, affd 59 NY2d 314). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
[*2]v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957 [2016]). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
[*2]v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d 956, 957). [read post]
