Search for: "Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins" Results 141 - 160 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Remanding for further analysis, the High Court noted that “bare” procedural statutory violations will not automatically confer standing, but they may be enough if there is a risk of real harm (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Remanding for further analysis, the High Court noted that “bare” procedural statutory violations will not automatically confer standing, but they may be enough if there is a risk of real harm (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:17 am by David Wright
  The Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court observed, had never addressed whether plaintiffs had standing to bring the claims under Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
Burwell, the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, and Spokeo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting the employer’s motion to dismiss, the court explained that under the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:03 am by Harris Hoffberg
Fortunately for Uber, the recent Supreme Court decision, Spokeo Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:28 am by Amy Howe
” At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Patricia Moore responds to a post by Wen Fa at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog (which in turn responds to a column by Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times) on Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]