Search for: "Spray v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 11:49 am by Kevin Sheerin
” Also, Respondent use of the OC spray was impermissible because the directive states that use the spray in less than three feet away from the intended target because spraying the OC spray in close range can cause severe eye and skin irritation or other injuries. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 7:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Map of South Dakota highlighting Union County (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the District of South Dakota Judge Karen Schreier will hear arguments from Beef Products, Inc (BPI) seeking to remand its $1.2 billion defamation suit against ABC News to state court, Reuters wire service reported.The case, Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:07 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Story County (Iowa) District Court Judge Dale Ruigh last week ruled in Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 11:59 am by Kevin Sheerin
” Also, Respondent’s use of the OC spray was impermissible because the directive states that use of the spray less than three feet away from the intended target is impermissible because spraying the OC within close range can cause severe eye and skin irritation or other injuries. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:04 pm by WIMS
It is true that the NRC relies in part upon mitigation at nuclear power plants -- including various coolant sprays and makeup water systems in case of pool drainage -- to conclude that the risk of an accidental or terrorist-caused fire in the pools is uniformly low. [read post]
The district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction was affirmed (Sunless, Inc. v. [read post]