Search for: "Springer v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 8:10 am by admin
by Sarah Taylor, SpringerLyle ••• In June of 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided an important issue regarding the warning labels on prescription drugs in Pliva, Inc. et al v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
  The final version of the work will appear in Julien Chaisse, Jędrzej Górski and Dini Sejko (eds) The Regulation of State-controlled enterprises: An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination’ (Springer forthcoming 2021). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Assuming (unrealistically) that the entire fee were subject to Delaware’s 8.7% corporate income tax, the state would receive $518,363,718.07. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
(trade mark law: dirty tricks and acquiescence in honest use); Case C-162/10 Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Ireland and Others (communication of a work to the public, via a hotel bedroom)Case C‑145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the right to respect for private life under Article 8 ECHR encompasses a right to protection of reputation (Axel Springer AG v Germany [2012] ECHR 227 [83]). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:21 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The ECHR Grand Chamber in a 12-5 vote concerning Axel Springer v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
 2) [GC] (nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, paras 104-07), Axel Springer AG ([GC], no. 39954/08, paras 85-88), Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The Court noted that it had to balance the right to freedom of expression with the individual’s right to respect for private life, in accordance with the well known Axel Springer criteria. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am by Nick Reo
Secondly, the Springer journal Climatic Change released a special issue entitled “Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, Experiences and Actions”, Volume 120, Issue 3, October 2013. [read post]