Search for: "Springer v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
As noted above, in its decision the ECtHR has applied the well-established privacy test formulated in Axel Springer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It’s a challenge to our deeply ingrained faith in the state. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
Having regard to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by national courts, the Court applied the criteria set out in von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (2012) 55 EHRR 15 and Axel Springer AG v Germany [2012] ECHR 227 as relevant for the balancing exercise between Articles 8 and 10: Contribution to a debate of general interest A distinction had to be made between the core message of the article and the details contained therein. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Ronald Collins
Peters, editor, Precedent in the United States Supreme Court (Springer, February 2014) Wendy Scott & Linda S. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am by Nick Reo
Secondly, the Springer journal Climatic Change released a special issue entitled “Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, Experiences and Actions”, Volume 120, Issue 3, October 2013. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:13 am by jgconrad
Tamsin Maxwell presents her perspective of the state of legal search at the time. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
(trade mark law: dirty tricks and acquiescence in honest use); Case C-162/10 Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Ireland and Others (communication of a work to the public, via a hotel bedroom)Case C‑145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]