Search for: "Stacey Dogan"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 8:46 am
Stacey L. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:09 am
Stacey Dogan, Northeastern: Disclaimer - she's not a philosopher. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
Stacey L. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:46 am
Lemley of Stanford Law School and Stacey L. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:14 pm
With Chris Sprigman, Mark McKenna, Bill McGeveran, Christine Haight Farley, Laura Heymann, Robert Brauneis, Stacey Dogan, Greg Lastowka, Viva Moffat, and Roger Schechter. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 8:36 pm
Daniel Sokol Stacey L. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:03 pm
Stacey L. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
Mark Lemley and Stacey Dogan have argued, quite persuasively on normative grounds, for a "trademark use" requirement before infringement can be found. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Timothy Greene As Stacey Dogan noted in her recent review of Bob Bone’s Taking the Confusion Out of “Likelihood of Confusion”: Toward a More Sensible Approach to Trademark Infringement, trademark law is at a bit of a crossroads. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Timothy Greene As Stacey Dogan noted in her recent review of Bob Bone’s Taking the Confusion Out of “Likelihood of Confusion”: Toward a More Sensible Approach to Trademark Infringement, trademark law is at a bit of a crossroads. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Stacey Dogan and Wendy Gordon, Functionality Dogan: Project: IP protection for product design more generally; functionality is a key concept here, and on the copyright side separability. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:17 am
Rothman, The Right of Publicity’s Intellectual Property Turn Stacey Dogan, Stirring the Pot: A Response to Rothman’s Right of PublicityMark Roesler, Term, Breadth, and WaivabilityJeremy Sheff, Scope and Justification of the Right of PublicityMark P. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:03 pm
The discussions will be led by Robert Bone, Stacey Dogan, Wendy Gordon, Mark McKenna, and Rebecca Tushnet, each of whose scholarship will be among the materials of focus. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Mark McKenna should be interested in this one, which also features Stacey Dogan and Glynn Lunney. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:50 am
Stacey Dogan, Mark Lemley, Jessica Litman, Mark McKenna, Jennifer Rothman, Jessica Silbey, and I filed an amicus in the Mongols trademark forfeiture case. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Stacey L. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
Here's the whole list: * Law professors' brief by Stacey Dogan and me * Electronic Frontier Foundation brief by Jason Schultz, Corynne McSherry and Fred von Lohmann * Public Citizen brief by Paul Levy * eBay/Yahoo/AOL brief by Celia Goldwag Barenholtz, Janet Cullum and others of Cooley Godward Kronish (warning: 1.8MB file) Other source material in the case: Google's initial brief Rescuecom's initial brief District Court's opinion [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
The role of justifications and equitable considerations in trademark law: Stacey Dogan Many of the early cases are limiting protection b/c of some interest they’re trying to protect on the other side—Borden is an exception. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 1:20 pm
These scholars (Stacey Dogan and Mark Lemley most prominently) argue that the only use of another's mark that are actionable under the Lanham Act are uses as a trademark. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
McKenna, Trademark Use and the Problem of Source in Trademark LawDinwoodie/Janis and Dogan/Lemley Colloquy, 92 Iowa Law Review 1597-1721 (2007)Stacey Dogan and Mark Lemley, The Trademark Use Requirement in Dilution Cases, Santa Clara Law Review (forthcoming) (2008) William G. [read post]
